Friday, June 01, 2007

Does spending more guarantee good test results?

Please allow me to preface these charts with a couple of comments.

1. I dislike using the WKCE as the measure of success as it only a snapshot in time and does not reflect the progress made throughout the year in the classroom. With that said, the state does need a tool for measurement and the WCKE is the only game in town.

2. I realize that RUSD faces challenges that many districts do not, but frankly I am tired of that excuse. Saying a poor child cannot learn is ignorant, and in some cases bigoted.











It is clear that RUSD (in the past) spent more than some districts and have far less (in test scores) to show for it.


My question is this - since the referendum for June 12th has been cancelled (therefore less money for the district for the upcoming school year) what sort of impact do you think we will see next year at this time?

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

While the Cat's Away...

Hello everybody, Mr. Racine's Report Card here. Brenda is out of town, and made the mistake of leaving me the keys to the blog. The first thing she said was, "Don't change any of my settings. Don't change the font or color." HA! HA! HA!

So what should we talk about?

Brenda called me about the time that she was supposed to be arriving at camp. She was lost. Made a wrong turn somewhere. Now on her behalf, the map from the school that she was following was a bit crude. So I hopped on the old interweb, and got a good map of the area where she was supposed to be.

Once I figured out where she was, I started telling her how to get back on track. She had the audacity to start telling me I was wrong. I kept my cool for a bit, but she kept insisting that roads were not where I was saying they were. I finally lost it and said, "Do you have a freakin' map? I have a freakin' map. Listen to me!". "Oh, I guess you're right. I thought blah blah blah ... ", she says. Yeah, you thought wrong.

Now don't get me wrong, Brenda is one of the most intelligent people I know, but sometimes she makes me mental. She did finally make it, although a bit late. You're welcome Honey.



Maybe later I'll invite Mr. Kat's Cradle over, have a few beers, and see what this baby can really do. Stay tuned.



We'll be back right after these important messages...

There is so much happening on the RUSD front and normally I would be all over it, but I will be out of town until Friday afternoon. I will be chaperoning 5th graders on a camping trip.

Please check back Friday for my incredibly astute and thoughtful analysis (Ha!) of any recent developments.

(Now if only I could get Mr. Racine's Report Card to figure out this Blogger thing...)

Monday, May 21, 2007

Will they or won't they?

Tonight, the RUSD board will be discussing if the June 12th referendum should be cancelled. In case you have been under a rock, the administration and board have taken quite a beating over the last couple of weeks because of the brouhaha of the PBCG contract.

I will be attending tonight's meeting to see what the ultimate decision will be - they have a difficult decision to make. The way I see it is that they have to take in consideration the following thoughts:

1. Voting is one sure-fire way for voices to be heard. They are many people that want the referendum to be their sounding board over the latest scandal. There are also others on the other side who believe in the referendum. If the referendum would be cancelled, none of these voices would be heard.

2. If the money has already been spent (printing ballots), cancelling the referendum would be a complete waste of taxpayer funds.

3. There will not be enough time to schedule another referendum before the fiscal year starts on July 1st, so scheduling it after the proposed audit would be not possible for spending in the upcoming year. If the referendum fails, there will be 42 positions cut. Folks, there will not be a do-over.

I urge the board to consider these and other arguments as they vote tonight to decide whether or not to continue with the referendum.

UPDATED AT 8:49PM:

The RUSD board has voted 7-1 (Carlsen absent) to rescind the referendum resolution. The sole dissenting vote was cast by Ms. McKenna. She explained her reasons for her vote well, and some of her comments were in the same vein as my above comments.

This was a difficult decision for the board to make - I cannot fault the ones that voted to rescind the referendum resolution. Hopefully, the district can learn from this experience so it never happens again.

Regarding the 42 FTEs on the chopping block, Dr. Vanden Wyngaard stated that the Teaching and Learning division (which she oversees) has NOT had a discussion regarding cutting art, music, library and Phy Ed in the elementary schools. This was an ugly rumor she wanted to put to rest. She will try to cut the $3M + in other areas (materials, equipment, etc) before cutting staff. That is good to hear.


(FYI - The county has already spent somewhere in the vicinity of $11,680 for the special election-the district will have to reimburse the county for its costs.)

Saturday, May 19, 2007

Much ado about 'Roots'

RUSD is in the headlines again, and this time it’s not about allegations over its business practices– it is about the curriculum of a 6th grade social studies class. Social Studies, if you remember, is a course of study including geography, history, government, and sociology. Children learn about the cultures of different people, and hopefully use that knowledge to understand current and past human events. It is NOT simply studying the topography of different countries.

Unified’s official stance on canceling the showing of Roots is the following:

1. It does not support the district’s curriculum.
2. It is not a “judicious” use of media.
3. The content is not “appropriate” for the grade level.
4. The district did not approve it.

All of these reasons above may indeed be valid, but I ask the following questions:

1. Does designing a board game based on a favorite novel support the curriculum? My “advanced” 6th grader had such an assignment. Instead of learning how to identify the conflict, plot or antagonist/protagonist in a novel, we have our 6th graders designing board games based on a book they read. In my opinion, this is an assignment more closely aligned with the learning capacity of a 1st grader.

2. Is showing Honey, I Shrunk the Kids or Spy Kids in MATH class a judicious use of media? We have 6th grade teachers, showing these (and many more) movies in MATH class so the teachers have time to grade tests.

I may be off-base, but I find the hypocrisy of the decisions of central office administrators disturbing. It is okay for a MATH teacher to show Spy Kids, but not okay for a SOCIAL STUDIES teacher to show Roots to his students?

What is the real reason for canceling Roots? It is disturbing and may not be appropriate for some 11 and 12 year olds, but please do not insult my intelligence and tell me it’s all about the districts policies.

Friday, May 18, 2007

Racine's Report Card takes a vacation

I guess I have worked myself out a job, so to speak. There are numerous bloggers talking about both the recent allegations of the PBCG contract and there are new allegations rising every day…

The list of bloggers is growing exponentially so I apologize if I miss anyone:

Peter
Fred
Still Unreal
Kay
Nick
Caledonia Unplugged
Gop Folk

And of course a special thanks to Kat , who like me, has been paying very close attention to RUSD for the last few years.

I’m glad y' all are finally realizing how serious the problems may be – and I want to give a "shout out" to the person who made this all possible (you know who you are).

Rest in Peace, Jasmine


Visitation for Jasmine Owens will be from 4 to 7 p.m. Sunday at New Pitts Mortuary, 2031 W. Capitol Drive. The funeral will be at 11 a.m. Monday at Mason Temple Church of God in Christ, 6090 N. 35th St.
Two funds have been set up for Jasmine's family. One is at Legacy Bank, 2102 W. Fond du Lac Ave., Milwaukee, WI . The other is Educators Credit Union, 7025 W. Appleton Ave which is also in Milwaukee.

Word of the day

Use this word in a sentence:

bafflegab

(Please do not use a dictonary)

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Al Gore Sings Grease Summer Nights about Global Warming

This doesn't really need an introduction!

Napoleon Dynamite -- White and Nerdy

This one is for you, Kat!

Vote for Pedro

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

A fractured fairy tale

Once upon a time, there was a great village with many riches. Over the years this village decayed, but since there were still young people with dreams living within this village, the residents ignored the decay around them. The schools, full of those young villagers with dreams, soon began to decay too. The leaders of the village brought in a stranger to lead and help the decaying schools. He came with dreams of returning the schools and the village back to the greatness it once had. But alas, his dreams were expensive; the poor village did not have enough gold to give the stranger they brought in to lead their schools.

Then one day, a group of strangers wandered into this once great village with its once great schools. They told the village that they could help the schools find more gold – but it would cost the villagers a little of their gold for their efforts. The school leaders were excited, for in fact these strangers seem to know exactly where all the gold was. The school leaders took the advice of this new group of travelers and soon turned their schools into shining beacons of learning. The stranger, the group of travelers, and the entire village lived happily-ever-after.

Of course this is just a fairy-tale. We know now that instead of using the consultants as they should have been used (on a consulting and temporary basis) we are now relying on this for-profit company to handle not only the finances of our district, but MANAGE the entire operations. In reality, this group should have been used on a short-term basis to help us better manage all the “gold” the villagers give to the schools.

Monday, May 14, 2007

Board defines scope of audit tonight

Tonight, the RUSD is having a special meeting to “discuss and define the scope and objective” of the proposed audit of the PBCG contract. Much hullabaloo has been made of this business partnership over the last week or so. Hopefully tonight the RUSD board will lay the groundwork to answer all the questions, rumors and accusations that are flying around town.

Remember, we get what we deserve. A well meaning phone call today (even to just leave a message) might not be a bad idea. Here is the contact information for the board; do yourself and your neighbors a favor and give them a call to let them know how you feel! I suggest both “sides of the fence” do this; the board needs all the input they can get.

If you do or say nothing, how can you complain about the results? RUSD is the largest recipient of our local tax dollars, yet there seems to be some kind of disconnect in the community. This community (collectively) gets all excited over the funds for remodeling Monument Square, Pointe Blue, and $200 bumpers yet we continue to ignore the very real problems the Racine area faces – poor performing public schools.

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Suggest a question for the RUSD board

The JT has an interesting weblog today; it is titled “Suggest a question for Tom Hicks and Nick Alioto”. They and the Journal-Sentinel have been granted 15 minute interviews with Dr. Hicks and Mr. Alioto of PBCG.

This weblog is a good idea – I’m sure all the stakeholders of the district have questions they want answered. In fact, this idea is such a good one I think I will start my own!

When the school board meets on Monday to discuss the audit of the PBCG contract, what sort of questions do you think the board members should ask? Should the scope of the audit be purely financial, or more comprehensive?

(Please note that some RUSD board members do read this blog on a regular basis so your suggestions will not be in vain…)

I will start it off with some questions of my own. School funding resources are finite; there are limited grants and resources to the +400 school districts in the state. If PBCG is representing more than 1 school district, how do you determine which school district is the one that should seek out any extra financing? Is PBCG representing any other district of similar size/demographics?

Okay now it’s your turn… What do you think the board should examine in its audit?

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

The Real Tragedy

Today, the RUSD board voted unanimously on having the current PBCG contract/payments audited by a neutral 3rd party. I applaud this new board’s way of tackling problems head-on. With that said, I wish the discussions about the contract and bonuses would have happened last year when the contracts were signed.

Under current board policy, however, the superintendent can retain professional services (such as PBCG) without board approval. For those of you who know me; you know that I hate Policy Governance with every ounce of my being. I like “accountability” and Policy Governance leaves just too many loopholes for any true accountability.

You would also know that in recent months, I have had a “coming to Jesus” sort of revelation about the district’s academic plans for the future. I desperately want this district to succeed, and cannot understand why there is not more attention paid to the everyday happenings of RUSD. You all get sanctimonious over $15.00 car rental fees and choo-choos to Chicago but no one seems to care where and how over $250,000,000 is spent each and every year!!

I predict that nothing will come out of the proposed audit; after all Dr. Hicks was operating under the limitations the board THEMSELVES wrote and PBCG’s only crime is capitalism. I do not think it was a good idea for administration/board to hire a for-profit company to control governmental monies, but that is a whole other issue for another time.

The real tragedy, as I see it, is that with all of the negative attention RUSD has received over the last couple of days, the June 12th referendum is doomed to fail. Under the new Chief Academic Officer’s leadership, the monies from the referendum would have benefited, both directly and indirectly, the children of this community. A failing referendum will not hurt Dr. Hicks, Nick Alioto or Roger Dickson – it will only hurt the children, families, and other stakeholders of the district. Perhaps the citizens of the community are finally ready to accept the challenges we face and conquer them together. I hope so, because we cannot continue to ignore the very real problems our community faces.

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Are the PBCG bonuses justified?

Way last June, certain Racine area bloggers (me and RDW) questioned the $304,000 bonus paid to the Public Business Consulting Group, the consultant group that is acting as RUSD’s financial team.

Now, 11 months later, long-time district employees are (finally!!) questioning the bonuses paid to PBCG. It also seems the payouts are even larger than expected.

As I have said in the past, I am sure that everything in the contract is “legal” , but I still question paying bonuses on savings not realized yet and the practice of having an outside consultant act as the business manager of our district.

What do you think?

Update: PBCG has worked in RUSD for the past 1 1/2 years, and under the guidance of their team the district has cut millions from its operating budget. They have also moved some expenses to accounts that do not operate under the revenue cap. I am not questioning their actions or any legalities, I know that this team knows the ins/out of school finance like no others in the state. I am simply questioning the amount of the bonus. Doesn't a 20% bonus seem a little high, especially since their contract (5 year) is over 2 million dollars?

Please keep in mind that this team replaced one person, who did not make over $400,000.00 dollars a year.

Friday, April 27, 2007

The legacy of our past

Turmoil in the political structure of our schools is not new – the greater Racine community has a long acrimonious history with its schools, most likely starting with the formation of a unified school district. Perhaps I am not the best person to reflect on the past since I was only a child when the school strikes in the 70s happened. When the teachers turned to the Blue Flu tactics in the 90s, I was an adult but did not yet have children in the district. As such, my interpretations may be slightly off the mark.

The way I see it is this – if we cannot learn from our past, we are doomed to make the same mistakes again and again. Anyone who understands the current climate of RUSD knows that this is not the first RUSD board that is dysfunctional. In the 90’s we had a board that micromanaged every proposal administration made – there were even numerous censures of board members. Clearly the leadership of that board added to the Blue Flu Epidemic of 1998. Obviously, no one wishes to repeat this ugly saga.

Because the board does not want to repeat the mistakes of former board members, our Board of Education has taken a hands-off approach for fear of being accused of micromanaging. Here lies the conundrum, having a hands- off approach is not the solution either. As with most problems, the true solution is most likely a compromise of sorts.

Having the board micromanage the district is not the answer.

Giving the superintendent free reign without accountability (and yes, that may include some critical comments/concerns) is not the answer.

The stakeholders in this community need to work together and find the right answer or we are doomed.

Thursday, April 26, 2007

I want a guaranteed contract too

So, Dr. Hicks wants a contract extension with a guarantee that no one will question his objectives – that sounds good. Where can I get a gig like that?

After a long and sometimes excruciatingly painful process, I believe the district is at least headed in the right direction. I also understand that a change in leadership may negate the progress that has been made, but where is the accountability if your 9 “bosses” cannot question/comment on the work you have done?

Isn’t this the reason we have elected officials in charge?

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Update on RUSD special meeting

This is what I understood and wholeheartedly believed in before attending the "special" meeting of the RUSD BOE meeting tonight that discussed improper board member behavior.

1.Everyone has a right to free speech, even for sitting board members to criticize fellow board members in the local media.

2.Having the right to say something does not absolve one from any responsibility.

This is what I undertsand and wholeheartedly believe after attending tonight's meetin.

1. Our board is only concerned with the rights of the "majority" voice.

2. The entire section of the Policy Governance Manual that deals with board behavior needs to tossed out with the recyclables since it is apparent the policies are not going to followed by anyone.

3. If the board could just remove this continuing political posturing of epic proportions from its procedures, perhaps they could focus on what they were elected to do - hold the administration accountable for the education of our children and the responsible use of tax dollars.

Now, wouldn't that be refreshing?

(By the way, in case you hadn't figured it out - there was not any action taken at tonight's meeting.)

When parents go bad

Can the parents involved be expelled as well?

When board members go bad

Yet again, the RUSD board has an item on the agenda that will be dealing with board behavior. This is becoming all too common – I certainly hope this will not be a recurring theme.

However, there is one main difference. This item is not scheduled in closed session as it has in the past; it is being dealt with in a special meeting tonight at 7:00 PM. Hats off to the new RUSD BOE President, Tony Baumgardt for recognizing that an open forum is the best (and most legal) way to take when dealing with board behavior.

However, with that said, I would think that if we did not have board members condoning changes to the US Constitution we might have a little more progress in the governing process and less bad behavior from the board.

Take the RUSD Board of Education test

Amusing column from Mike Moore of the Journal Times… How did you score? Share your thoughts….

MPS wants to handcuff its students


Since I have strayed from RUSD to MPS, I thought it would be appropriate to discuss the recent MPS board approval of flexible handcuffs to subdue unruly and violent students. I have to admit at first, I was slightly taken aback. It does seem inhumane, but after some additional thoughts on the matter, I believe I could support something like this in any school district.

Like it or not, some of our schools are dangerous places and most of them do not have full-time police officers on duty. For safety sakes, sometimes the best solution would be to restrain a child with these cuffs. As long as these handcuffs are used to keep other children/staff safe, and NOT for discipline, I think it is a sad, but reasonable, measure to take.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

Springtime in Wisconsin: Cut your grass and cut educational programming


Springtime in Wisconsin means different things to different people. Some people cannot wait to get back outside, work in the garden and cut the grass for the first time. Others, like school administrators and board members dread spring, because the cutting they have to do is not outside, but in the classroom. You see, each spring they have a budget to complete for the upcoming year and every year it seems a little harder to complete.

Many districts across the state have joined the ranks of RUSD in cutting programs in order to balance the budget. One of the reasons why RUSD seems to be continually asking the residents of eastern Racine County is that when the revenue caps went into effect in 1993, the RUSD board did not levy the maximum amount (thinking the revenue caps were only going to be in effect for a few years). However, the revenue caps were made permanent and RUSD has been behind the proverbial 8 ball ever since.

I think the revenue caps are a great idea in theory, but the current constraints of the QEO (Qualified Economic Offer) and the equalization aid is now hurting many districts across the state. Clearly, we need a different way to fund our public schools. We need to take the burden off the property tax rolls and make it more equitable for all.

Back in 2003, Governor Jim Doyle appointed a blue-ribbon commission to study the issue and they recommendation was an increase in the sales tax.

Is shifting the burden of funding our schools from the homeowners to all consumers the best way to do this? What do you think?

Note to self...


Note to self: Nothing good will come out of throwing produce at RUSD board members.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Urban school reform: It takes a village

This morning as I was making my way through the Cheddarsphere over my morning coffee, I stumbled across an entry from Jay of folkbum's rambles and rants which discusses the intensive and comprehensive reform plan MPS is undertaking. Over 40 educational experts got together and drafted the plan.

You might ask “Brenda, what’s so great about drafting a plan? Don’t you think RUSD has a plan to be the best urban district by 2010?”

My answer would be that of course I know that RUSD has a plan, but the public was not part of the planning/input sessions. Also MPS is asking for feedback for the draft plan at upcoming listening sessions and get this – VIA THE WEB - for those stakeholders that cannot attend the listening sessions.

I wish more people in our community would demand to be part of the process of improving our schools…

Thursday, April 19, 2007

RUSD Board to silence all dissent

Already some of the local bloggers (here and here) have weighed in on the proposed changes to the RUSD Board Governance policies, but I feel a strong desire to weigh in the issue myself and provide a slightly different perspective.

Having been in attendance at most of the RUSD board meetings for the last few years, I have seen the progression from how they did business a few years ago to how they currently run their board meetings under the “new” Policy Governance. I can say that I have never been a huge fan of their new way of doing business, but I can now say that Policy Governance (with the proposed changes) is NOT the direction I would head if I sat on the board. I believe the board is moving to silence all board dissent and perhaps even trying to rewrite the Constitution. RUSD Board Members ARE elected officials, and they are elected to represent their constituents and ask questions. This is NOT disrespectful – it is RESPONSIBLE.

Furthermore, I question the judgment of the leadership of the board member(s) timing of these changes to the board policy. Helloooooo, there is referendum scheduled for June 12th!! Do they want this to pass or not?? Having asked many annoying questions over the years, and probably ticked off more than my fair share, I have watched the district slowly and painfully try to turn itself around and move in a positive direction. Up until today, I was convinced they WERE moving in the RIGHT direction.

Now, another debacle they have to overcome and another fire to put out. Instead of moving ahead in a positive direction, the leadership of RUSD will be sidetracked by this snafu that could potentially harm the district and the children it serves. We need to continue to move ahead in a positive way, our children are losing ground against their peers each and every day…

If the referendum fails because of the negative publicity the district will undoubtedly receive by trying to limit the free speech of their board, they only have themselves to blame.

My sincere thanks to the RUSD board member who passed this information to me - you are NO LONGER on notice (or dead to me).

Friday, March 23, 2007

Clarification on why I support the referendum

It has been brought to my attention that I left out a very important reason on why I am supporting a proposed RUSD referendum. In my earlier post, I had said I wanted to know EXACTLY where the money was going before supporting any additional spending, and I meant it.

Although not reported by the any media, the RUSD Referendum Chairperson (Mr. Nielsen) had suggested the district will provide the voters and citizens of our community a detailed list on the districts website. Once a month, this list would be updated with the projects done, the cost of each, and perhaps a running balance.

In this way, the voters can see where EXACTLY the money is going, and how much of their money is left. Unfortunately, this kind of transparency is needed before the district brings forth any new spending. There is a level of distrust among the voters who do not follow the districts finances on a regular basis.

At least three board members (McKenna, Dey and Bangs) are also looking for more details before approving any amounts, and rightfully so. They will be held personally accountable at the polls, so they to need to make sure they know EXACTLY what they are approving.

The administration of our district MUST provide both the board members and the citizens of the community a detailed and transparent list of expenditures if they expect any referendum to pass. I will support a referendum, as I am sure many others will, if the district acts in a transparent and open way.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

I support a RUSD referendum

The title of this post is not a joke; I really do support the idea of a referendum and I am going to tell you why. Over the last year, I have been very public in my criticisms of the school district on this forum. Administration and board members have both been targets of my wrath at times and rightfully so. However, there has been progress, albeit slow and painful, in the district.

First, and foremost, RUSD is finally getting their financial house in order. They have streamlined the transportation department saving $400,000. They have switched their 3rd party health-care administrator saving what is projected to be $6 M. They are currently trying to streamline the special education area to be more cost efficient; there are not any numbers yet on this issue but I have been told the savings will be significant. (Of course, I am sure that Mr. Roger Dickson will point out countless other savings he has identified, but remember he and his partners were paid a bonus on many of the savings they found.)

Are there still areas that need to be looked at, of course there are but many of those areas where there are still savings cannot be arbitrarily changed because of the union contracts.

Unlike many in the community, I have pored over the annual budget and have asked many questions. There really isn’t much left to be cut. The current school funding formula may be part of the problem. While I appreciate the control the revenue caps have against the bloated budgets of the 1980s and early 1990s, the formula does not address the changes we have seen since that time. A school district is only allowed to increase its spending 2% each year, yet the QEO offers a guaranteed minimum increase of 3.8% to its teachers.

I realize that the equation is not really that simple. Other variables like rising property tax rates (which RUSD has no control over) and equalized funding also are part of the formula, but Racine with its declining population and depressed property values are not helping RUSD in reaching its budgetary needs.

The residents of Wisconsin need controls over government spending; however, I am not entirely convinced our current school funding formula is doing an adequate job. I know the legislators meant well back in 1993, however the current solution is not working for RUSD (or any school district for that matter). It is time to look for new ways to fund our public schools. Other states have schools and do not have the enormous property tax and state tax bills we have here in Wisconsin.

So where does it leave us here in Racine? The district has finally addressed the real needs our schools have in technology and facilities and are asking voters to authorize the spending. When board members asked what if would take for me to support a referendum in past years, I have always stated “Get a handle on rising healthcare costs, streamline operations and tell me EXACTLY where my money is going, and I’ll be the first in line at the polls voting yes.”

Regretfully, I guess its time for me to put my money where my mouth is….

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Is it too soon?






Is it too soon to be talking about who is going to the next president of the United States? I think that it is, but I haven't had a chance to show my support for my candidates in the past presidential elections. The candidates I favored were out of the primaries by the time the voters of Wisconsin had a chance to vote.


As you can see, I am again on the fence. If by chance both of them make it to the general election, I will have a very difficult decision to make - but then again, I 'm worrying for nothing.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

Jot this date down, please

Please take the time today to pull out your Treo, cell phone, planner (or whatever it is that you use to keep yourself organized) and make this entry: Tuesday, April 3rd – VOTE.

Spring elections are notorious for having low turnout, and this frustrates me to no end. Our local leaders, and the decisions they make, have a far greater impact on our day-to-day lives than some yahoo in Washington, DC. As a bonus, these are the same people you see at the grocery store, church or local watering-hole, and may actually LISTEN to you. Compare this with trying to communicate with President Bush on an issue that is of importance to you.

Consider this post, and the others to follow, as simply a public service announcement to the members of the community. I will probably have a post in the future about the candidates I am supporting, and the reasons why I am supporting them. I will not ask you to vote for them, but I will be asking you to please VOTE.

Doyle fails a simple math test

"First and foremost, this budget maintains the state's commitment to fund two-thirds of the cost of our kids' education." (Governor Doyle in the Feb 13th budget speech)

As a parent of children in RUSD, I know our students are able to compare percentages, decimals, and fractions and determine if the numbers are equivalent. Apparently our governor, Jim Doyle, does not possess these rudimentary mathematic skills.

It has been reported that in the upcoming budget cycle, the state has not lived up to its promise of 2/3 funding for the state’s public school system. For the 2007-2008 school year, his budget includes funding of 65.3%. Both my children (5th and 6th grade) are able to state (with much confidence!) that 65.5% is LESS than 2/3.

Doyle aide Matt Canter insisted that the governor lived up to his promise. "This is two-thirds funding," (JS 3/6/06)

I know what you’re thinking – come on, it’s pretty close – cut the guy some slack. But consider this – public schools cost $9.2 BILLION dollars so every percentage point represents about $92M. This is not pocket change, my friends.

So the shortfall is about $100,000,000 – that’s a lot of zeros to be made up. I’m not debating whether it was the right thing (fiscally) to do; I’m trying to examine why he feels the need to lie about it. Does he think we wouldn't notice?

Saturday, March 03, 2007

The RUSD political shell game

On Feb 7th, the RUSD Board of Education’s Legislative Committee held an unprecedented meeting with the trustees of the surrounding suburban villages. The intent of this meeting, I believe, was to establish some kind of ongoing dialogue with the leaders of our community. I believe this was a good first step, however, I think the mayor and the county executive should have been there, too.

The meeting was not confrontational as many had predicted it would be; it was a “warm and fuzzy” love-fest of epic proportions. At the end of the meeting, many village leaders asked “Where do we go from here?” The RUSD Legislative Committee promised that they would meet, break down the area of concerns (safety, student engagement, busing, etc), and get back to the village leaders with more concrete plans to address the concerns. I assumed (don’t ever assume anything!) that this would be done in a timely manner.

On March 26th, the Legislative Committee is finally meeting to discuss this initial meeting – 47 days later – nothing like addressing the problem head-on! At this point, do they even remember what was said at the meeting?

I have come to expect nothing less from any elected official – I think this is simply another political shell game that masquerades as “progress”. I hope I am wrong, our schools are in need of change and it will take all the stakeholders in this community to right the wrongs of past leadership.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

A question for the REA

David, A JT blogger, posed this question on a recent JT post that concerned the lack of action by the RUSD to redistrict. His response was favorable to neighborhood schools and one of the many questions he posed was this:

Would neighborhood schools be better served if we moved the teachers around versus noving the students around?

Not being a teacher, or a dues-paying member of ANY kind of union, I ask the following question as a follow-up...

... do you think the REA would support an idea like this?

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

A light at the end of the tunnel

I wish you all could have been at 2200 Northwestern Avenue last night for Dr. Vanden Wyngaard’s “public debut” and presentation on closing the achievement gap. If you had, you would realize what an “ace in the hole” she is. She is one of the nation’s top experts in closing the achievement gap, and the citizens of greater Racine should know that we are lucky to have her.

She is dynamic and very engaging; I dare anyone to listen to her and not walk away thinking that closing the achievement gap cannot be done. The only obstacles, as I see it, are the grown-ups in the district! By grown-ups I mean us all – teachers, administrators, taxpayers and parents! We need to step up and do what is right for educating ALL of the children in the district. I believe that if Dr. V had been working along side of Dr. Hicks since his coming to Racine; the suburban communities, the NAACP, and the RTA would not be in battle-mode right now.

As inspiring as she is, she cannot do it alone. It will be difficult for her, I imagine, to change the mind-set of many in our community. From teachers to community members, everyone needs to change their feelings about how we educate our children. If this cannot be done, I shudder to think what will become of this community.

I know this might sound like I have lost my mind – I am supposed to be one of the crazed Caledonia residents who hate all things RUSD, right? I suppose for those of you who do not know me personally, it might seem that way. As I am fond of saying, I just want good schools. I don’t care if there are RUSD schools, Caledonia schools or schools run by the Hare Krishna. I just want good schools. The easiest solution for all is just to make RUSD a place that educates ALL children – and Dr. V, as I see it, is our best chance to get there.

Realistically, any action by Caledonia to create an independent school district, is years away. My children are in the system now, so I need to make sure my children are getting the best possible education NOW!

Monday, February 26, 2007

It's crunch time for RUSD board

The RUSD Board continues their discussion on the redistricting tonight at 6:30PM. Time is ticking away if any changes would be implemented for the upcoming school year. The district’s demographers have already done a study based on the recommendations of the Equity and Access Committee and a study based on neighborhood schools. Brian Dey, a RUSD board member, has already drafted a proposal to fit the neighborhood school scenario.

Now, I understand Dr. Hicks has drafted a proposal as well. I imagine this proposal will be discussed at much length Monday evening.

I just hope the board can come to some consensus so the district can move forward. I fear that they will put off any decision until the Supreme Court weighs in on the 2 school equity issues they currently have before them.

As I have said before, I do not believe it is important as “how” the schools look, but “what” goes on inside them.

Let’s pray that the board members will finally come to a decision – they cannot move on with the more pressing issues (such as grade configuration ) until they have decided the redistricting, They have been promising this since the 2003-2004 school year.

The time to act is now….

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Cat Lovers Beware

I'm warning all feline lovers to not to watch this video (this means you, Kat)

For me it just keeps getting funnier every single time I watch it...

Another look at the violence in our schools

What you're looking at is a tabulation of "reported" incidents of violence against RUSD staff for the month of January. I wouldn't normally post anything like this but the fact that there was only 1 "reported" incident in our high schools is noteworthy.

By reading this, we can only assume that our high schools are safe and functional; it would seem that the problems with violence are only with our middle and elementary schools.

P.S. In case you haven't figured it out already, I am being somewhat (okay, extremely) sarcastic.

A question of hypocrisy?

One last thing about the past Caledonia CDA meeting that discussed the next steps for creating an independent school district in Caledonia. I will pose it as a question...

Why is the education liaison of the Johnson Foundation and former president of the Wisconsin Charter School Association ( and currently serving on the board of the 21st Century Preparatory Academy) so against the idea of Caledonia seeking an alternative to RUSD?

His comments at Wednesday's meeting were welcomed because he is a resident of Caledonia, but I left that meeting trying to figure out what he was so afraid of.

After all, actions speak louder than words. He has made it his lifelong ambition to ensure there are alternatives to RUSD for a select few, but when Caledonia wants to do the same, he is against it?

I ask you this, why the vehement opposition?

Friday, February 23, 2007

Wednesday's Caledonia CDA Meeting

I was going to write about Wednesday’s CDA meeting at the Caledonia Community Center but then I read Kat’s take on the meeting, and realized I could not even begin to explain the situation as well as she. Check it out

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Late night update on marathon meeting

I just got home from the RUSD meeting and they were still going strong when I left... Tonight's meeting was poetry in dysfunction.

As suspected, the Paullin Group update item on the agenda made for what could have been kind of ugly. The school board president did reign in a couple of board members, but not before the configuration of the schools came into question. As you may know, the board directed the Paullin group to configure the schools K-6, 7-9 and 10-12. The results of the 1.5 million study did not reflect these changes, and some board members are understandably concerned.

Another concern, is that many board members thought that detailed blueprints would be included in the study. The initial RFP was supposed to get detailed building specs, the board members (and me included) assumed that meant blueprints. This detail was in the initial bidding process, but we did not get the blueprints, simply a detailed list of what each classroom should have. All in all, the study may be a thorough one, but I do not think that it was worth $1.5 million. The price tag was an issue of concern also, as The Paullin Group was not the lowest bidder in the initial bidding process.

Somehow, I do not think this issue is a dead one...

Do we just need to move on? Part of me says this is the right thing to do...

Monday, February 19, 2007

Things to watch for at RUSD business meeting - Part 2

I noticed that there will be an update on the Paullin Group (facility study) Report this evening. I expect there may be outraged board members bringing up "old" issues regarding the study, everything from questioning the proposed configuration of the buildings to the initial bidding process. If I am correct, I ask what has taken so long?

I even predict that referrals will be made at the appropiate time in the meeting. However, I believe that the best ideas go to "referral" and are never heard again.

Let's hope I'm wrong...

Things to watch for at RUSD business meeting

Tonight is the regularly scheduled business meeting of the RUSD School board. Among the items on the agenda are the results from the latest Edulog study (the one used for redistricting) and a presentation on a 5-year balanced budget.

If you have never attended a board meeting, I suggest you start tonight. Here's a couple of things you should look for in tonight's meeting:

1. Does the Edulog study support increased busing for socio-economic status?

2. Does the 5 year "balanced" budget include money for security, maintenance, or technology? Or will these programs rely on the district passing another referendum?

3. Is the budget really balanced? How can the district state the budget is balanced when we do not know what the State of Wisconsin will be giving the school district in its next biennial budget? Governor Doyle has shortchanged the schools and not lived up to the promise of 2/3 funding in the past, and the state is currently facing huge deficits.

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Too funny...

After this very depressing week, I need to laugh. I have never posted one of those fowarded e-mail thingies, but this one made me giggle. Hope it does the same for you...


Most of you have read the scare-mail about the person whose kidneys were stolen while he was passed out. Well, read on.

While the kidney story was an urban legend, this one is not. It's happening every day. My thighs were stolen from me during the night a few years ago. It was just that quick. I went to sleep in my body and woke up with someone else's thighs. The new ones had the texture of cooked oatmeal. Who would have done such a cruel thing to legs that had been mine for years? Whose thighs were these and what happened to mine? I spent the entire summer looking for my thighs. Finally, hurt and angry, I resigned myself to living out my life in jeans and Sheer Energy pantyhose. Then, just when my guard was down, the thieves struck again.

My ass was next.

I knew it was the same gang, because they took pains to match my new rear end to the thighs they stuck me with earlier. I couldn't believe that my new ass was attached at least three inches lower than my original. Now, my rear complemented my legs, lump for lump. Frantic, Iprayed that long skirts would stay in fashion.

It was two years ago when I realized my arms had been switched. One morning I was fixing my hair and I watched horrified but fascinated as the flesh of my upper arms swung to and fro with the motion of the hair brush. This was really getting scary. My body was being replaced one section at a time. How clever and fiendish.

Age? Age had nothing to do with it. Age is supposed to creep up, unnoticed, something like maturity. NO, I was being attacked repeatedly and without warning. In despair, I gave up my T-shirts.

What could they do to me next?

My poor neck suddenly disappeared faster than the Thanksgiving turkey it now resembled. That's why I decided to tell my story. I can't take on the medical profession by myself. Women of the world, wake up and smell the coffee. That really isn't plastic that those surgeons are using.


You KNOW where they are getting those replacement parts, don't you? The next time you suspect someone has had a face "lifted", look again. Wasit lifted from you? I think I finally found my thighs - and I hope that Cindy Crawford paid a really good price for them!

This is not a hoax.

This is happening to women in every town every night. WARN YOUR FRIENDS!

P.S. I must say that last year I thought someone had stolen my breasts.I was lying in bed and they were gone! As I jumped out of bed, I was relieved to see that they had just been hiding in my armpits as I slept.

Now I keep them hidden in my waistband.

Saturday, February 17, 2007

The dangers from within our schools

And just a reminder, even if our children are safe from intruders from the outside, what is going to be done about the dangers from within our schools?

WTMJ update on school assault case

WTMJ (Channel 4) is reporting that the suspect in the recent school assault was accused of a similar crime in 2005, but a criminal complaint was not filed. The earlier victim reportedly did not back up his original story. Thank goodness, the recent victim did not do the same. This little guy should be commended for his courage; he may very well have saved another from experiencing the same horrific fate.

In fact, commendations should go to both the staff of the school and the Racine Police Department for their quick response to the alleged incident Tuesday.

Lawmaker aims to allow the blind to hunt

This story makes me realize that Wisconsin legislators and lawmakers do not hold reign as being the most stupid…

Friday, February 16, 2007

A study in irony

i·ro·ny- An outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, expected.
(Reference: Internet resource site www.dictionary.com)


The irony of two separate events this week amazes me – a young life is changed forever by a sexual offender here in Racine and our governor is now backing off key portions of a law that would have required child predators to be monitored by a GPS system for the rest of their lives. Apparently he is now worried the new bill (which he signed last spring) is unconstitutional and the offenders’ rights are being violated because tracking will occur even after their probation is served.

I ask this, what about the rights of the young victims and the community as a whole? Child predators, as I understand it, are very hard to rehabilitate and many times they return to the same kind of behavior after their sentences have been served. I think a GPS system to track the offenders is the very least we can do to protect the most vulnerable members of our society – our kids.

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Normalcy can return to our school

With a suspect now in custody, hopefully the parents, children and staff at Red Apple Elementary (and the entire Racine area) can breathe a sigh of relief and try to return to normalcy. With TV crews from the Milwaukee news stations, along with at least a half-dozen police cars camped out outside the school all day, there has been very little “normal” happenings at the school. The children are frightened enough, police cars and news vans only make it worse.

Many are still playing the blame game – this needs to stop! This horrific incident was certainly a tragedy, but the real tragedy is if we as a community learn nothing from it. We need to stop trying to find someone to blame and start doing what is right for our community – our children are counting on us. Admittedly, we were lulled into thinking something like this could never happen, but it did. We need to be more vigilant for our children – they are our most precious gifts and they deserve a happy childhood.

My thoughts and prayers go out to all affected, I cannot imagine the pain you must be feeling.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

A Tragedy At Red Apple

As most of the regular readers know by now, there was a horrific incident at one of my children’s school yesterday. An unknown intruder found his way into the building and sexually molested a 6 year old child. As a parent, my heart is breaking for this young victim and his family. However, my heart is also breaking for the hurtful comments I read on the JT weblogs regarding the staff of Red Apple.

There are many to point fingers at the staff of Red Apple, but few are placing the blame where I feel it belongs. The blame should lie with the sick bastard that forever changed a young life yesterday.

Red Apple is one of the best schools in this district; they have a wonderful and caring staff. To blame them for the heinous actions of another is unfair and pointless. I feel that Red Apple has always provided my children with a safe learning environment. The many doors of the decrepit 130 year old building are locked, and visitors are required to “buzz” the main entrance to gain access to the building. I have been buzzed in many times, and I have never been offended when asked who I was. Because the only other school my children attended also had a camera/intercom system, I was not aware this was not a standard operating procedure for all of our schools. It needs to be….

Were there security breaches? Yes. Could parents (or intruders) still get in without being buzzed? Yes. Did parents hold doors open for others behind them, of course we did. Notice I said “did”, because I am sure no one in the near future will engage in this practice. The principal has sent another note home today asking the parents to assist the staff in keeping our children safe by practicing a few common sense strategies when picking up or dropping off our children.

Although some are demanding a meeting for the parents of Red Apple, I would suggest demanding a meeting for the other schools in the district. Like New York on 9/12/01, Red Apple Elementary today is an extremely safe and secure place. I would venture a guess that nothing like this will ever happen at Red Apple again – but it can happen at another school.

The parents of Red Apple have been informed of the steps being taken, but the parents of children attending other schools have not. They need to make sure that this kind of tragedy does not occur at their school. If it happened at Red Apple, I can assure you it can happen anywhere. Many of our buildings in the district are not designed with today’s needs in mind. This will happen again if the district does not start addressing the real problems this district faces.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Musings over assets and liabilities...

Winter sucks.... and its official - I am definitely getting a flu shot next year. I apologize for my prolonged absence, I am feeling a little better. In fact I felt good enough to attend the RUSD Audit Committee meeting last night. This committee only meets once or twice a year to discuss the outside yearly audit.

I will write more about the high points of the audit later, but I thought I would first share with you a comment one of the members of the financial team shared with the members of the audit committee.

When asked about the deficit and if it included the long-term liability of post-retirement benefits (as required by new governmental accounting laws starting next year), Mr. Dickson said it did not. The follow-up question was something along the lines of "How is the district going to structure those costs? All in one year or spread across multiple years?"

His answer was sort of surprising to me - he stated that if Caledonia seceded from RUSD he would recommend the single year concept so Caledonia has to pay up front.

I guess this makes sense, but if Caledonia has to pay 25% of the long-term liability, then I imagine the residents of Caledonia would get 25% of the assets too, right? Isn't that only fair? I imagine that the buildings that reside within the village will come at no additional cost to the taxpayers.

These, of course, are just my initial thoughts. I imagine soon we will know the real facts. Stay tuned - things could get very interesting.

Monday, January 29, 2007

I guess punctuation IS powerful...


Mom, where do babies come from?


The Pregnant Woman Keychain is a clear plastic woman's torso with a not-yet-born baby floating in the womb. As the photo shows, you can remove (or "deliver") the baby by popping out the ball that the baby floats in.

Honestly, this is about the dumbest thing I have ever seen.

RUSD better off without Caledonia?

From the 1/26/07 Key Communicator Meeting:

I am simply presenting the following without the usual added commentary from me; I will leave all comments to you, my loyal readers.

When asked about the proposed Caledonia referendum, Dr. Hicks told the group that Unified had started putting together some numbers in anticipation of an advisory referendum. It is interesting to note that the remainder of the district (sans Caledonia) will be better off financially than it is now, according to the RUSD superintendent.

Does knowing that RUSD will be better off (fiscally) without Caledonia make a difference to anyone?

School Board Member Press Release

This press release was sent to me; I thought it should be posted. I imagine it will bring forth much discussion.

Thoughts/comments?

For Immediate Release:
January 28, 2007
RE: Brian Dey’s Neighborhood/School Choice Plan
Contact: Brian Dey
bdey@tds.net
262-681-0661

Over fifty years ago, Linda Brown was an eight year old black child that had to cross Topeka, Kansas to attend a school that was designated as an all-black public school, while her white friends were free to attend the neighborhood school, just a few blocks away. The decision of the Supreme Court, in their ruling regarding Brown v. Board of Education, made it unlawful to separate children by the color of their skin, and striking down the courts previous decision, Plessy v. Ferguson, which allowed separate but equal schools. Over fifty years later, there is a fear that a neighborhood school plan would return us to the injustices of the past.

I am offering a plan that assures that neighborhood schools won’t take us back to those injustices. The plan calls for all children, district wide, to be assigned to the school closest to their home. The District would maintain district wide school choice with bussing provided for students who receive free or reduced lunch. The plan also calls for all schools to be considered in the neighborhood school concept including our magnet schools. Magnet programs will be kept intact but may have to be moved to different locations. To attract talented teachers to inner city schools, the District will provide specific training and pay incentives. Additional resources should be provided to inner city schools for counseling and social services. Multiculturalism will be included in the curriculum district wide. Lastly, capture as much diversity as possible, while maintaining sensible contiguous boundaries. The School Board will monitor annually that all buildings are equitable and that resources are expended based on need.

Many communities, including Milwaukee Public Schools, have returned to neighborhood schools, realizing the benefits to students, parents, neighborhoods and taxpayers. The benefits to students include little or no time spent on buses, the opportunity to be more involved in after school activities and the ability to receive help with school work after school. The benefit to parents includes the ability to be more involved in their child’s education. The neighborhood benefits by increasing pride and concern for their community, and will hopefully lead to citizens and community leaders becoming more involved. For the taxpayers, savings should be seen by reduced transportation costs and/or more money going directly to the classroom.

Segregation, as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary, is the policy or practice of separating people of different races, classes or ethnic groups, as in schools, housing and public and commercial facilities, as a form of discrimination. Drawing boundaries by neighborhoods and allowing the freedom of choice is color-blind. Whether you are Black, White, Hispanic or any minority, all would have the ability to attend their neighborhood school and the ability to choose any school in the district.

This plan is similar to the Milwaukee Neighborhood Schools Initiative outlined in the 1999 Wisconsin Act 9. We might be able to petition the state to grant us the same provisions Milwaukee has, which include provisions for facility bonding and additional aid.

In the thirty plus years of RUSD’s self-imposed desegregation policy, the achievement gap has not narrowed significantly. It’s time we rethink how we educate children. It’s time to believe that all children have the ability to learn and succeed. It’s time once again to have the school be the center of the community, and that all schools will be great schools.

Friday, January 26, 2007

What is a key communicator?

Today I attended my very first Key Communicator meeting at the RUSD Administrative Center (formerly known as "Central Office"). To tell you the truth, I was not sure what to expect. The meetings, I was told, are informal and lend themselves to open dialogue between Dr. Hicks and community members. I am happy to report this was all true. Dr. Hicks kept his opening remarks brief and to the point, and allowed for ample time for questions from the community members.

Going to school board meetings on a regular basis for the last few years, I did not expect to learn anything new at today's meetings - I only wanted to attend to hear the kinds of questions from other members of the community. I was pleasantly surprised to learn a few things today, which I will now share with you (because I am now a Key Communicator).

When asked why it was acceptable for a 4th grader to read at a 2nd grade level, Dr. Hicks said it was not acceptable. With the new testing tools in place (NWEA-MAP) and the baseline data recorded, each child tested is expected to have an increase in their RIT scores – this is a target. If they do not meet their targets, additional resources will be provided to the child that did not meet them

Okay, for the eduspeak-challenged this means that we have testing now that is done 3 times a year, and every child has different goals. Instead of waiting for months for the state test results, the district and teachers get them back the very next day. If a child or school does not progress, additional resources (teachers, tutors, etc) will be provided. Every school is responsible for the successes/failures in the buildings.


I have been asking for accountability for years, it appears I may finally be getting my wish. My only fear now is that somehow the volatile climate of this district will somehow impede real progress.

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Response to JT Commentary

My husband still smells of coffee from the shower I gave him this morning while reading the paper. Reading the commentary regarding the possible Caledonia advisory referendum over my first cup of java was not such a good idea in retrospect; I actually spewed coffee in my disbelief of what I was reading.

There are many things I feel were not represented well, but I will only cover a few here, perhaps I might even answer some of his many questions:

I wonder where you believe you will find the money to purchase or build new schools?

After paying millions to RUSD each year for the last 35 years, I would imagine that the citizens of Caledonia have to have at least some equity in the buildings residing within the village limits.

I wonder where you will find the money to hire people to run and teach in those schools you will build or buy.

I imagine it will be the same place RUSD gets their money – state and local property taxes.

How will you achieve the diversity required by federal law in those schools?

Racial diversity is required? Really, please inform Burlington, Oak Creek, Waukesha and the other hundreds of districts in Wisconsin that they are in violation of those federal laws. I believe the law states the district must reflect the makeup of the municipality. Besides, if you think Caledonia does not have ANY racial diversity, you are mistaken.

The money issues alone need to be answered before irresponsible and in some cases uninformed comments are made.

The Village is NOT making any decisions, voting in favor of the advisory referendum WILL NOT create a new district. Voting YES will only authorize the Village to investigate the financial impact of creating a new district. If the end result is a double in taxes I doubt ANYONE would support going forth. After the millions wasted on consultants in RUSD without any taxpayer approval , I applaud the Village of Caledonia of asking first, spending later.

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Finding another way around those pesky revenue caps...

From the AP Friday:

Public schools should be allowed to pay for safety officers without having to worry about exceeding the state-imposed spending limits designed to hold down property taxes, Governor Jim Doyle said Friday.

This is a warranted proposal, police and safety officers are desparately needed in our schools - ask any RUSD teacher, parent or administrator. With that said, however, I do think that the state legislature is heading down a slippery slope. They have already exempted some costs from the revenue caps through the establishment of Community Service Funds, now they want to exempt Safety and Security too? What’s next, an exemption for costly consultants?

I imagine that the governor and state legislators will soon find a way around all those pesky revenue caps and we will become the highest-taxed state in the country.

Friday, January 19, 2007

3 Reasons to support the proposed Caledonia referendum

The Village of Caledonia is seeking input from the citizens on whether on not a feasibility study should be done that explores creating a brand-new independent school district; they will be seeking input by potentially putting an advisory (non-binding) referendum question on this spring’s ballot. They are many reasons why this should not only go on the ballot, but should be passed. These are the top 3 (in my humble opinion):

1. Since the referendum is advisory in nature, voting YES does not commit the village to anything. There will be plenty of time to study the fiscal impacts for all involved parties.

2. It doesn’t cost anything. Unlike the recent RUSD June referenda that cost the taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars, this referendum is scheduled for a “normal” election day. Adding a referendum at the end of the ballot will not cost any extra tax dollars.

3. Voting YES in the proposed April referendum will authorize the Village to finally answer the oft-debated question “Can Caledonia financially support its own school district?” Frankly this issue comes up every few years and never gets a response; it would be nice to finally get an answer.

Caledonia takes its first steps...

The front page of the JT local section has an article about Caledonia’s proposed April referenda that would explore the feasibility of Caledonia creating a new independent school district. Although Randy over at RDW has already covered this, as well as Kat from Kat’s Cradle, I thought I would point out a few things that I feel may have been left out in today’s JT story.

First of all, the Community Development Authority DID make a recommendation to include an advisory referendum on April’s ballots. What wasn’t recommended was the wording of the referendum, although I believe the referenda will not include any mention of the word “secession”, “secede”, or contain any language that refers to the Racine Unified School District directly.

It was also pointed on in the JT story that typically the legal process to add a referendum to the ballot takes 45 days. At Wednesday’s CDA meeting, it was brought up since the proposed referendum is advisory in nature, and not a binding one; this 45 day legal window is NOT applicable. This means, the Village board has some leeway in its legal timeline, which I think is good news for the residents of Caledonia.

A Slight Shift in Focus

Although the name of this site is Racine’s Report Card, which reflects on the successes and failures of the schools in the greater Racine area, I do not live in Racine – I reside in the village of Caledonia. All regular readers of this blog (and other local ones) know that the village of Caledonia is taking its first step of creating a brand new independent school system. Many of the future posts will be on this topic, but I will still continue to write about RUSD.

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Government in action

Having spent many a Monday evening at 2220 Northwestern Avenue over the years, I am no stranger to seeing a governmental body in action (government in action – is that an oxymoron?). I thought I had seen it all, but apparently I was wrong.

Yesterday, I witnessed my first Caledonia Village meeting – the Community Development Authority (CDA) met to discuss a proposed TID district and the possibility of drafting a referendum that may lead to Caledonia forming an independent school district. I have to say I was impressed with how Caledonia conducts their business and treats the citizens who show up.

First of all, there were handouts for everyone, not just the board members. Nothing is more irritating than having to listen to people discuss what is on the bottom of page 2 when you have no idea what is on even on page 2!

Second, citizens were allowed to ask questions throughout the meeting. At Unified’s meetings, there is time for citizen comments at the beginning of each meeting, but the board and administration do not have to address any concerns brought up by the speaker.

Finally, not only can citizens ask questions – the questions actually get answered (or at least addressed).

I am embarrassed to admit that this was the first time I attended a Village meeting; but it certainly will not be my last.

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

The End is Near

Great, like I don’t have enough to worry about…. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists moved the clock to Doomsday ahead by 2 minutes. We are now only 5 minutes away from nuclear annihilation. Hopefully, it is just a matter of somebody watching a little too much of FOX’s show, 24.

Monday, January 15, 2007

New school district for Caledonia?


I found out earlier today that the Caledonia Village board is entertaining the idea of having an advisory referendum to create a new Caledonia School District – the Journal Times has too posted a piece on this at http://www.journaltimes.com/.

My question is this – shouldn't a community of Caledonia’s size have their own schools? Even smaller communities such as Burlington, Union Grove and Waterford have their own schools, why shouldn't Caledonia?

Besides the unknown start-up costs, what do you think the biggest challenge will be?

(Hint, I’m looking for positive discussion here - no name calling or derogatory remarks.)

My Nasty Little Secret

Many people ask why I don't just run for a seat on the RUSD school board - I have many reasons. The major one is that I have two children who have lots of homework and a husband that works 2nd shift - the other is I am finishing up my BS in Information Technology and with work and the kids I do not have much time.

But I have a new reason not to run - I smoke.

Yes, like Barack Obama I have a nasty (but legal) habit. Apparently there are many in this community who will not vote for a smoker. Thank you, open-minded citizens of Racine for giving me yet another excuse not to run for a seat on the RUSD board!!

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Police in our schools...

There is no doubt in my mind that the urban school districts in our state (MPS, RUSD, Beloit, etc) have a growing problem with violence – but is Racine Unified as bad off as MPS? It was recently reported that the Milwaukee Police Department was called over 11,000 times in the last school year. I know that a similar request to the Racine Police Department and Mt. Pleasant Police Department would not yield the same kind of numbers, even prorated to the smaller population of our community.

But does this mean our schools are safer, or even less violent? No, it means simply the schools are not calling for police to be sent to our schools because the police ARE ALREADY THERE!

Some people do not know this, but JI Case has a full-time police liaison in the school and there are also several off-duty police officers at the school each and every day. These off-duty officers report to Al Days, Unified’s director of Safety and Security. Al Days recently asked the board for increased funding;off-duty police officers don’t come cheap but they are desperately needed. At the recent study session where long-range budget predictions were presented, an extra $200,000 a year was set aside for this program. Let’s make sure that this line item stays in the budget, or RUSD (like MPS!!) will be soon making similar headlines in the paper.

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Wanna buy a cow?

Everyone has an opinion on how the schools in RUSD should be run – ask 10 people in the community “How the district can improve?” and you may very well end up with 10 different answers. However, these people will not (for the most part) run for a seat on the board since it is widely believed that an ordinary citizen does not (and cannot not) understand the very real problems and cannot serve as well as somebody with a masters or doctorate degree.

Perhaps what the district needs is some leadership that is not educationally “learned” and not a member of the secret club of Educrats. How can the board represent the needs of the children in the district if they had not experienced life in the same way some of our students have? Just because a board member has advanced degrees does not make him/her an effective leader.

Remember, the boards' sole responsibility should be to provide broad direction for the district- Administration (the experts) still have final say in how these board decisions are implemented.

The following quote kind of sums up my feelings quite nicely---

He was so learned that he could name a horse in nine languages; so ignorant that he bought a cow to ride on.

Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)

Friday, January 12, 2007

Making the case for reconfiguration

I have already expressed my feelings on the recent RUSD hot-button debate of neighborhood schools versus busing for socio-economic equality. I have stated both scenarios have potential drawbacks, and the best solution would probably be a blend of the philosophies. But I will keep lamenting on the subject because the district needs to make a timely decision; they need to move ahead and focus on their other plans to improve student achievement.

I am not suggesting that there will not be gains in student achievement by some sort of redistricting; however there is something I believe will raise the test scores and increase student engagement even more than redistricting – reconfiguring the schools to the junior high configuration. One board member has said (repeatedly) that the 9th grade failure rate skyrocketed after the implementation of the middle school concept, and has never really stabilized over the years. There is also the case of reconfiguring to make the schools smaller and more manageable.

When RUSD reconfigured the districts’ school in the 1983-84 school year, RUSD had approximately 22,000 students. It has been explained to me that there were long-range predictions done at the time that suggested that the district would only have 15,000 students in a few years, so although the schools were overcrowded the public was assured that the overcrowding would be for only a short time.

But there apparently something wrong with the demographer’s long-range predictions, there hasn’t been the predicted decrease in students as expected; 23 years later we have approximately the same amount of students and our schools are just as overcrowded.

The big three comprehensive high schools are designed for 1200-1400 students, yet we have 2200 students in them! Simply by moving the 9th graders out of these schools would be a huge first step in reducing the overcrowding at our schools – of course 6th graders would need to then move back to elementary schools – and this is where the problem lies, I believe. With the expanded 4-year old kindergarten and all-day 5-year old kindergarten, there is no longer room at the elementary schools for the 6th graders.

The Paullin Group has recommended that the district build 3 early childhood centers to house the both kindergarten and the early childhood programs – this of course will cost money and lots of it! Is the general public willing to invest in the future of our community, or are we destined to keep making the same mistakes again and again? We need action, not a board afraid to make an unpopular choice. What the district “looks” like is not as important as how the district functions. We need to focus on student achievement, not secondary issues like racial balance and busing. I am not trying to convey that racial balance is not important; I am simply suggesting that student achievement should be the district’s primary mission.

The first step in making the district sustainable is making the schools work, and they cannot and will not work when we have high schools that are dangerously overcrowded.

Please urge the board members to make a decision on redistricting so the district can focus on their primary mission – educating the young people of this community.

Monday, January 08, 2007

Another showing of Groundhog Day

Remember the Bill Murray movie Groundhog Day, where the main character has to keep living the same day over and over again? Yeah, tonight’s RUSD board meeting was kind of like that.

You see, way back last September (9/11 to be exact) the board started seriously talking about redistricting. To redistrict, the board had to decide if it was going to listen to the community and return to neighborhood schools or expand busing for racial and socio-economic status. To get a better idea of where the children are living, the board decided to hire a demographer. The board wanted to test the theories of neighborhood schools and ordered a report that would show where the children are in relation to the schools. They were told by administration the first baseline report would take 4-5 weeks, so at the latest the board should have seen the report by the end of October.

Now in January, 3 months later, the board finally sees the baseline report and it is not the report they asked for. Communication wires got crossed, again! So tonight the board again asked for a report from the demographer with the following parameters:

1. Children will attend the closest reasonable school provided there is capacity.
2. There will be an opt-out option if the parents do not want to send their child to the neighborhood school.
3. All the Unified buildings were thrown back in the mix, including the now closed Caddy Vista and Winslow and the magnet school buildings (including Janes Elementary – the year-around school).

This is virtually the same language that was used on 9/11 but this is not what the board received last Thursday at their study session. Now we will have to wait 5 more weeks for this scenario before “testing” another? Is it any wonder that the wheels of government roll slowly?

Saturday, January 06, 2007

The Referendum Is Coming, The Referendum is Coming!!

These were the projected deficits for the next three years, if the RUSD administration had done nothing:

$9.2M
$11.9
$14.4

After the recent reductions/revenue enhancements, the projected deficit is $2.8 million for the first year, with a small surplus for each of the consecutive years.

This is good news for the taxpayer, right? Fiscal problems solved, let’s move on to another topic…Wait, you didn’t expect to let off that easy, didya? There are, what the RUSD financial team refers to as “add-ons” – money we need to include each and every year, which RUSD has not done in years, if ever.

$3.3M in facility upkeep
$1.5M technology upgrades
$200,000 for Safety and Security (in addition to a one-time charge of $200,000)

The financial team is urging to the district to seek a recurring referendum of $6.45M to cover this expenses. Recurring without an expiration or sunset date?

While I agree that our buildings are in dire repair, the technology in our classrooms and schools are about 15 years out-of-date, and we definitely need to have safer schools – I cannot and will not support a recurring referendum. Didn’t the Waukesha school board try that last year? Just keep giving us the money; we don’t want to tell you what it is for!

Instead, I will support a shorter-term (3 year) multi-year capital referendum that outlines exactly where the money will be going – I actually think that referendum might have a chance in passing…

The Weekly Report Card

A look back at the previous week’s news:

The first week of the year usually brings feelings of hope for change; some people make resolutions to quit smoking, lose weight or seek better employment. Others resolve to change their worlds in a bigger way – they run for elected office. Hats off to all the residents who this week turned in their nomination papers and are seeking change within their communities by running for public office. Some names are familiar, like Fred Dooley of RealDebateWisconsin and Brian Dey, a current RUSD school board member who is seeking a seat on the Caledonia village board. One name is even more familiar (to me anyway) because I share his surname – Taylor Wishau of Burlington. Taylor, a 17-year-old senior is seeking a spot on the Burlington School Board. Taylor is a wunderkind of sorts – his understanding of politics is rare (and so refreshing!) in someone so young.

Good luck to all of you on April 3rd!

Weekly Report Grade: A

The first week of the year also should have also brought hopes of change within the Racine Unified School District. The district, for years, has done little in the area of redistricting creating a very expensive and lopsided mess. With the promise of the results of the in-depth demographic study, the taxpayers of eastern Racine County once again had their hopes crushed. The data which was presented at this week’s RUSD study session did not include approximately 2400 students, which consists of the students at the charter and magnet schools and the children who attend a school outside of their attendance boundary. This latest snafu was blamed on a “problem with the technology”. I believe it is due to a “problem with the communication”. How a decision can be made if the board does not have all the needed information?

Weekly Report Grade: F

Friday, January 05, 2007

RUSD Community Survey - By the Numbers: Part 3

In concluding my initial impressions of the 2006 Community Survey project, which was presented at last night’s RUSD study session, I will leave you with an interesting bullet point that was included in the PowerPoint presentation:

“Although student achievement was not considered to be a major problem in 2000, close to one-half of survey respondents perceived it as a major problem in 2006.”

My question to you is this – why such a dramatic change in public perception? Is the general public simply paying more attention to academic achievement, or do the members of the community believe that our children are worse off academically than they were 6 years ago?

RUSD to seek recurring referendum?

The first portion of last night's RUSD meeting was devoted to the discussion of the district's long-term financial planning. Very enlightening to say the least....

I will be posting something soon that may have everyone asking the question "Is RUSD gearing up for a recurring referendum?"

RUSD Community Survey - By the Numbers: Part 2

I will continue to breakdown the highlights of last night’s RUSD study session, which included the presentation of the 2006 Community Survey Project:

2 out of 3 respondents support the concept of neighborhood schools.

2 out of 3 respondents support parental choice.

2 out of 3 respondents support the expansion of the magnet school programs to other buildings.

For some, it might seem that these ideas are contradictory. For example, some perceive that magnet type programs will take up additional space at neighborhood schools, ultimately making it impossible for neighborhood children to attend. However, I believe these responses share a common thread. Parents want the right to send their children to any school they wish, whether it be the school closest to their home or a school across town.

RUSD Community Survey - By the Numbers

The following numbers represent the breakdown of last night’s RUSD study session . Topics discussed were long-range budget planning, the presentation of the latest Community Survey and an update on the Edulog demographic study.

Obviously, some of the numbers presented last night can be interpreted several different ways and can be discussed for hours – but I thought I would provide a recap of what I perceive as the major talking points of the Community Survey:

69% of survey respondents support the concept neighborhood schools (the school closest to their home)

31% of survey respondents support the concept of neighborhood schools when it includes the additional bussing to achieve racial diversity.

29% of survey respondents support the concept of neighborhood schools when it includes the additional bussing to achieve economic diversity.

Also nearly 50% of survey respondents support neighborhood schools even though it may require the relocation of magnet school programs to other building locations.

I think these numbers speak volumes about what the community wants, and when compared to the data collected in 2000 and 2004, it is apparent that the numbers are consistent from year-to-year.

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Deadline for Filing RUSD Nomination Papers Passes

Today was the deadline for all interested parties to turn in their nomination papers for the upcoming RUSD School Board election.

There was one candidate, Mr. Van Atta, who filed before the Christmas holidays, but I have not heard of any more - I wonder if Mr. Van Atta will be the only candidate running.

We will soon know, I imagine, but let me take this opportunity to wish the best of luck to Mr. Van Atta and (?) any other candidates.

I respect the committment it takes to sit on the RUSD board; it is a thankless job. Especially when you have to put up with people like me!

No Child Left Behind?

A few nights ago, I caught the end of the rebroadcast of Dr. Hicks State of the School District Address on CAR20. I had tuned in just as he was finishing his speech, and was able to watch the entire Q&A segment that followed his presentation. None of the questions surprised me, however, one of Dr. Hicks answers did.

When asked why children were being socially promoted to the next grade level when they were not reading at grade level, Dr. Hicks replied “Grade level does not matter with Mastery Learning”.

Really, now? He went on to explain that a child can BE in the fourth grade and BE reading at 2nd grade level. He explained there is not a reason to hold the child back, because Mastery Learning allows the child to learn at his/her own pace.

I know that it can hurt a child’s self-esteem if the child is retained, but isn’t it more demeaning when the child gets to middle and high school and cannot read?

Is it any wonder why RUSD scores on the state’s WCKE are so abysmal? It is very possible that many 4th grade students take the 4th grade test and have never seen any of the information on the test in class because they are still working in the 2nd grade book.

Up until a few years ago, children who had not mastered the basics in the early primary grades were given extra attention (via reading specialists and teacher assistants). Now, it seems that many children are not getting the “extra” time they need. It is definitely easier to remedy this situation when the child is 7, rather than having to enroll in the new reading recovery program, Read 180, in high school.

It seems to me that the Mastery Learning has created a whole new generation of children “left behind”.